Legal Opinion
Esden v. Retirement Plan of the First National Bank
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided September 28, 1998No. 2:97-CV-114PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
On April 21,1998, Lynn Esden filed a first amciiUoU víaos auLlun ^umplaiiiL v, ¿xuicmlcil Complaint”), alleging that ‘Ttlhe Retirement Plan of The First National Bank of Boston and certain affiliated companies” (“Retirement Plan”) violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et. seq. (“ERISA”) by miscalculating the benefits due to plan participants who elected to receive accrued benefits in a lump sum. Esden contends specifically that participants in the Retirement Plan received less than the present value…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Esden v. Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Esden v. Bank Of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Miele v. Pension Plan of New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement FundDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999