Legal Opinion
Miele v. Pension Plan of New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 25, 1999No. 1:97-cv-00475PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER
ROSS, District Judge.
On January 29,1997, the plaintiff Anthony Miele filed the instant action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). The defendants filed an answer and counterclaim on March 13, 1997. Pending before the court are motions for summary judgment from both parties. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in part and defers decision on the remainder of the motions pending a hearing regarding the timeliness of plaintiffs remaining claims.
I Factual and Procedural Background
Except where…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cheryl Chapman v. Choicecare Long Island Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Novella v. Westchester CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Paul Miller v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company and Resorts International HotelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Laurenzano v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. Retirement Income TrustDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- L.I. Head Start Child Development Services, Inc. v. Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.