Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1942No. 28620PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff wife in a motor vehicle collision. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants. The trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on the ground that certain instructions requested by them had been erroneously refused. Defendants have appealed.

Appellants maintain that the court erred in granting the motion for a new trial for the following reasons, broadly stated: (1) The appellants’ motion for a directed verdict at the trial should have been granted, the verdict in their favor being the only one…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Lindsey v. ElkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Bino v. VeenhuizenWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Pearson v. Arlington Dock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Grubbs v. GraysonWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. PeersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Dickins v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & HelpersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  4. Smith v. Penn Line Service, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Rose Wong and Kent Wong v. Walter Swier and Laura SwierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API