Rowe v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff wife in a motor vehicle collision. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants. The trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on the ground that certain instructions requested by them had been erroneously refused. Defendants have appealed.
Appellants maintain that the court erred in granting the motion for a new trial for the following reasons, broadly stated: (1) The appellants’ motion for a directed verdict at the trial should have been granted, the verdict in their favor being the only one…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Lindsey v. ElkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Bino v. VeenhuizenWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Pearson v. Arlington Dock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Grubbs v. GraysonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. PeersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Dickins v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & HelpersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Smith v. Penn Line Service, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
- Rose Wong and Kent Wong v. Walter Swier and Laura SwierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.