Legal Opinion

State v. Peerson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 9, 1991No. 24516-3-IPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

The State charged Rick Melvin Peerson with two counts of first degree assault and two counts of aggravated first degree murder, alleging as the aggravating circumstance that on or about November 25, 1986, Peer-son assaulted Mack Smith and Rick Damiano and murdered Thomas Mott and Roger Fox as part of a "common scheme or plan". Peerson was convicted on all four counts. He appeals, challenging (1) the trial court's entry of judgment despite arguably inconsistent jury verdicts, (2) the sufficiency of the "to-convict" jury instructions, (3) the trial court's admission of incriminating statements…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. McNealWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Herring v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Herring v. DEPT. OF SOC. AND HEALTH SERV.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. State v. StrohmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API