Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1936 Model Ford Coach Automobile, Motor No. 18-2550887

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided November 18, 1944No. Civ. A. No. 312PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOVETT, District Judge.

In this action the United States of America filed a libel against the above .described automobile which was seized by officers of the Alcohol Tax Unit on July 7, 1944, while in the possession of Abraham Green and while being used in the transportation of two gallons of distilled spirits on which the tax had not been paid. The automobile was duly forfeited by order of the court. Walter Austin, claimant, then filed his petition as owner of the car praying that the forfeiture be remitted or mitigated and that the car be returned to him. The case was heard before the court,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1935 Ford Standard Coach AutomobileDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1935
  2. United States v. One 1937 Ford Truck Motor No. BBI-3424365, Ohio 1938 License 6-BR-86District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1939
  3. United States v. One Plymouth Coupé, Engine No. PC 93353District Court, D. Maryland · 1936
  4. United States v. One Studebaker Coupe, 1940 Model, Motor No. 92811District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1941
  5. United States v. One Ford CoachDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  2. United States v. One 1946 Mercury Sedan AutomobileDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1951
  3. United States v. One 1936 Model V-8 Ford CoachDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1945
  4. United States v. One 1950-51 Ford Van Type One & One-Half Ton TruckDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1954
  5. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API