Legal Opinion
United States v. One 1935 Ford Standard Coach Automobile
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided December 17, 1935No. 4338PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, District Judge.
The petitioner, C. I. T. Corporation, assignee of a certain automobile purchase-money promissory note secured under a conditional sales contract reserving title in the seller, files its petition to rescind an order of forfeiture to the United States and to reclaim one 1935 Ford standard coach automobile, described in the foregoing caption.
The order in question was entered on September 10, 1935, on motion of the United States attorney, upon an ex parte showing pursuant to an act approved May 27, 1930, §§ 9, 10, 46 Stat. 430 (U.S.C. title 27, Supp. 7, § 42).
It appears…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Blodgett v. HoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Lucas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Universal Credit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. One 1936 Model Lafayette Coupe Automobile, Motor No. LE-30499, Serial No. L-30999District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936
- United States v. One Plymouth Coupé, Engine No. PC 93353District Court, D. Maryland · 1936
- United States v. One Terraplane SedanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938
- City of Buffalo v. BrooksNew York Supreme Court · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.