Legal Opinion

United States v. One Ford Coach

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1938No. 48PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

Leave was granted to file supplemental briefs. These have now been submitted and the cause ripe for a ruling.

The fact situation will be developed in the course of the discussion of the case. A Ford coach, in the possession of one Harry Maseloff, was being used in the transportation of liquor in evasion of tax payable thereon. The coach, because of this, became forfeitable, and in an appropriate libel proceeding was duly forfeited by decree of Court. Following this the Atlas Automobile Finance Corporation as owner of the coach filed its petition praying that the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Plymouth Coupe (1941) Serial Number 15051526District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. United States v. One 1936 Model Ford Coach Automobile, Motor No. 18-2550887District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1944
  3. United States v. One 1946 Mercury Sedan AutomobileDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1951
  4. United States v. One 1936 Model V-8 Ford CoachDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API