Bodger v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Certiorari. Petitioner seeks the annulment of an order of respondent court on the ground that it exceeded its authority in appointing an attorney to represent the beneficiaries of a testamentary trfist.
*712The Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles is the duly appointed and acting testamentary trustee pursuant to its designation as such in the last will and testament of decedent and pursuant to the decree of distribution of his estate. Under the terms of such trust, petitioner is the sole beneficiary of the current income therefrom. By the terms of the decree of distribution, the fees of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Lilienkamp v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- In re the Estate of PinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of BodgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Andrews v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960