Legal Opinion

State v. Wood

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1973No. 7329SC685PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

By their first argument defendants contend that the court should have granted their motions for nonsuit based on the position that the evidence against the defendants came from an accomplice and was unsupported by other evidence. Defendants concede that the law of this State is as stated in State v. McNair, 272 N.C. 130, 157 S.E. 2d 660 (1967):

*269“ ‘It is well settled in this jurisdiction that although the jury should receive and act upon such testimony with caution, the unsupported testimony of an accomplice is sufficient to sustain a conviction if it satisfies the jury beyond a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AllredSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. State v. McNairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Karpf v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bunny Bread v. ShipmanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  2. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API