State v. Sargent
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BALEY, Judge.
During the trial of this case, the State introduced considerable evidence concerning the preparation and use of Molotov cocktails, the damage caused by the fire at Pate’s Store, and the discovery of a glass jar and gasoline-soaked soil near the store. Defendant contends that this evidence should not have been admitted, since he was charged only with procuring felonious burning and not with the actual burning of the store. This contention is not correct and must be rejected. When an individual is prosecuted for procuring felonious burning under G.S. 14-62, he is being charged with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. DossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Durham v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983