Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Workers' Compensation Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 7, 1984No. 5-1982; CA A24274PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

The Workers’ Compensation Department (department) has petitioned this court to reconsider our decision in which we found that three department rules were valid and three rules were invalid. 65 Or App 659, 672 P2d 1343 (1983). We grant reconsideration to consider the effect of OAR 436-69-701(3), a rule that was not cited by either party in any of the arguments which have previously been made to this court.

As we noted in our original opinion, ORS 183.400(1) limits review in this court to consideration of the rule, the applicable statutes, the constitutions and the documents evidencing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Kemp v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Llewellyn v. CrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Chiropractors for Justice v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Llewellyn v. CrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Schlip v. Oregon Fish & Wildlife CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Scheidemantel v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API