Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Workers' Compensation Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 1983No. 5-1982; CA A24274PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This is an original proceeding brought pursuant to ORS 183.400(1), seeking a declaration as to the validity of five rules established by the Workers’ Compensation Department. Pursuant to ORS 183.400(1), this court can find a rule invalid only if it finds that it violates the constitution of the State or the United States, exceeds the statutory authority of the agency or was adopted without compliance with the Administrative Procedures Act. ORS ch 183. Review in this court is limited to consideration of the rule, the applicable statutes and constitutions and the documents evidencing compliance…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Larson v. ValenteSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Llewellyn v. CrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Chiropractors for Justice v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Llewellyn v. CrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Kemp v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Schlip v. Oregon Fish & Wildlife CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API