Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human Resources
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 11, 1983No. CA A20856PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Petitioners, individuals and public interest organizations, 1 bring this proceeding pursuant to ORS 183.400 2 to invalidate an administrative rule promulgated by the Department of Human Resources, Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD), that provides state medical assistance for certain “elective” abortions.
The administrative rule, OAR 461-14-052, provides: 3
“(1) Payment will not be made for elective abortions performed except under the following conditions:
“ (a) Cases in which a physician, on the basis of his or her professional judgment, has certified in writing that the abortion is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Bell v. Low Income Women of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Department of Health & Social Services v. Planned Parenthood of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Women of the State v. GomezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Women's Health Center of West Virginia, Inc. v. PanepintoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.