Sidney Blumenthal & Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, District Judge.
From the pleadings, the evidence, and the stipulation- of the parties, it appears plain that there -was a deviation, and that respondent thereby: became liable for the full value of the cargo, and must be adjudged to pay it, unless clause 8 of the bill of lading, providing that no suit shall be commenced after six months from the delivery of the goods to the consignee, or after nine months froin tho receipt by the carrier, operates to defeat the Suit, it riot having been brought within that period.
Libelant asserts that deviation abrogates the contract, and that none…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Johns N. F. Shipping Corp. v. . S. A. Companhia Geral Commercial Do Rio De JaneiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Steamship Willdomino v. Citro Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- The SarniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. Dampkiesaktieselskabet BaltoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Rosenberg Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thyssen, Inc. v. S.S. Fortune Star, Her Engines, Boiler, Etc., Evolution Maritime Enterprises, Ltd., and Taiwan International Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Wessel, Duval & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Farr v. Hain S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Francosteel Corp. v. N. v. Nederlandsch AmerikaanscheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Barber v. Southern Pac. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.