Legal Opinion
Steamship Willdomino v. Citro Chemical Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 3, 1927No. 29, 30PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
Respondents instituted proceedings in rem against the “ Willdomino,” a British vessel, to recover the value of' five hundred and three (168 and 336) casks of citrate of lime owned by and consigned to them, which she accepted. June 10, 1920, at Messina, Sicily, for delivery at New York, subject to issued bills of lading. After leavingMessina the vessel put in at Gibraltar, Lisbon, Ponta Delgada (The Azores), North Sydney (Nova Scotia) and. Halifax. While passing between the last-named ports, through negligent navigation, she struck a reef or submerged object; water filled her forward…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Johns N. F. Shipping Corp. v. . S. A. Companhia Geral Commercial Do Rio De JaneiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Constable v. National Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- The SarniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Charles Pfizer & Co. v. Convoy S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- The Citta Di MessinaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1909
3Cited by98 opinions
- The Malcolm Baxter, Jr.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- May v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Jones v. the Flying ClipperDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Thyssen, Inc. v. S.S. Fortune Star, Her Engines, Boiler, Etc., Evolution Maritime Enterprises, Ltd., and Taiwan International Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- American Tobacco Co. v. the Katingo HadjipateraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.