Legal Opinion
Farr v. Hain S. S. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 1, 1941No. 326PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The case arises upon an appeal from an interlocutory decree in the admiralty, which disposed of two proceedings: first, of a petition for limitation of liability filed by the Hain Steamship Company, Ltd. (of which we shall speak as “Hain”), owner of the “S. S. Tregenna” in which the firm of Farr & Company (whom we shall collectively call “Farr”) were the only claimants ; and, second, of a libel for freight filed by.“Hain” against “Farr.” “Farr” bought certain parcels of sugar in Cuba which they chartered the “Tregenna” to carry; some of the sugar was damaged, owing to a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Steamship Willdomino v. Citro Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- The Malcolm Baxter, Jr.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Richard Deeves & Son v. Manhattan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- The PoznanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- Bennett v. Union Central Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Jones v. the Flying ClipperDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Northern Helex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, Assignee of Steve Radeff and Carl Robinson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Peter Pannell, Libelant-Appellee v. United States Lines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Thyssen, Inc. v. S.S. Fortune Star, Her Engines, Boiler, Etc., Evolution Maritime Enterprises, Ltd., and Taiwan International Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.