Legal Opinion
Davis v. Timmonsville Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 21, 1922No. 2054PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRONER, District Judge.
This is an action at law, brought by the Director General of Railroads against the defendant, an oil company located in Timmonsville, S. C., for the recovery of demurrage charges, amounting to $2,890, on a number of cars of cotton seed oil delivered to,“and accepted by, the oil company during the month of October, 1918. At the conclusion of the evidence the District Judge directed a verdict for the defendant, and entered judgment on the verdict thus rendered. So much of the facts as are necessary to an understanding of the case are as follows:
The plant of the oil…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Esteve Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. GoodridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Norton v. ShotmeyerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1947
- Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Whitley v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Garrison Coal Co. v. HindsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Hooper-Mankin Fuel Co. v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.