Legal Opinion
Hooper-Mankin Fuel Co. v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1929No. 2751PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the appellee, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, hereinafter called the railway company, rendered by the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, in a suit at law brought by the railway company against the appellants, the Hooper-Mankin Fuel Company and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, hereinafter called, respectively, the fuel company and the surety, under a bond given by them to the railway company. The precise terms of the bond are hereinafter set forth. The suit was originally…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Guarantee Co. of North America v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Leggett v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Glass v. the Sloop BetseySupreme Court of the United States · 1794
- National Surety Co. v. McCormickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Norton v. ShotmeyerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1947
- Atlas Assur. Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Kentucky Rock Asphalt Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Southern Surety Co. v. People's State Bank of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931