Legal Opinion

State v. Rushton

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 9, 1992No. 1 CA-CR 90-484, 1 CA-CR 90-584PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Presiding Judge.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Appellant John Thomas Rushton (“defendant”) was convicted following a jury trial of one count of indecent exposure. The jury failed to reach a verdict on three counts of child molestation alleged in the same indictment. The trial court suspended sentence on the indecent exposure conviction and placed defendant on probation for three years with a special condition that he serve one year in the county jail. Subsequently, defendant entered an Alford, 1 plea of guilty to one count of attempted child molestation in exchange for dismissal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. DawsonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. ViaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. DraperArizona Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State v. PetrakCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. State v. Carol M.D.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. State of Arizona v. Rohan Livingston ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API