Legal Opinion

State v. Draper

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1989No. CR-88-0307-PRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

We granted the state’s petition for review to consider whether a criminal defendant entering an Alford plea of guilty can voluntarily and intelligently forego the right to interview the victim as part of a plea agreement with the state. We hold that, under certain circumstances, a defendant can permissibly enter a plea agreement on the condition that defendant not interview the victim. We decline to adopt a per se rule prohibiting such a condition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

Facts

Petitioner Martin Hale Draper…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. State v. CrowderArizona Supreme Court · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. McKinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. J.D. M.M. v. Hon. hegyi/t.D./state of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. StillingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  5. State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API