State v. Draper
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORCORAN, Justice.
We granted the state’s petition for review to consider whether a criminal defendant entering an Alford plea of guilty can voluntarily and intelligently forego the right to interview the victim as part of a plea agreement with the state. We hold that, under certain circumstances, a defendant can permissibly enter a plea agreement on the condition that defendant not interview the victim. We decline to adopt a per se rule prohibiting such a condition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
Facts
Petitioner Martin Hale Draper…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. CrowderArizona Supreme Court · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. McKinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- J.D. M.M. v. Hon. hegyi/t.D./state of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. StillingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.