Legal Opinion

State v. Dawson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1990No. CR-89-0184-PRPublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

The state petitions for review of the court of appeals decision affirming defendant’s convictions and refusing to correct sentencing errors pointed out by the state in its answering brief to defendant’s appeal. The issue we must address is whether, in the absence of an appeal or cross-appeal by the state, an appellate court has subject matter jurisdiction to correct an illegally lenient sentence when a criminal defendant appeals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. § 12-120.24. We granted review pursuant to rule 31.19, Arizona…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Arizona v. ManypennySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. FraserSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  4. United States v. SangesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. State v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Neely v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Abelardo Chaparro v. David C ShinnArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. SteffyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API