State v. Petrak
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERBER, Judge.
¶ 1 David Edward Petrak appeals his conviction for misconduct involving weapons pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 13-3102(A)(8) (Supp. 1999). He contends the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence and in failing to instruct the jury that, to convict, it had to find more than a mere temporal nexus between the guns and the drugs that formed the factual basis for the charge. We agree and reverse Petrak’s conviction for weapons misconduct.
FACTS
¶ 2 Petrak was charged by indictment with possession of marijuana for sale, possession of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Plummer, Marquis AndreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State of Arizona v. Rohan Livingston ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State v. KeenerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.