Legal Opinion

State v. Petrak

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 11, 2000No. 1 CA-CR 99-0730PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

¶ 1 David Edward Petrak appeals his conviction for misconduct involving weapons pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 13-3102(A)(8) (Supp. 1999). He contends the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence and in failing to instruct the jury that, to convict, it had to find more than a mere temporal nexus between the guns and the drugs that formed the factual basis for the charge. We agree and reverse Petrak’s conviction for weapons misconduct.

FACTS

¶ 2 Petrak was charged by indictment with possession of marijuana for sale, possession of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Plummer, Marquis AndreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. State of Arizona v. Rohan Livingston ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. State v. KeenerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API