Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio DUARTE-HIGAREDA, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1997No. 96-50179; D.C. CR-91-00408-2-MLHPublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the issue of whether a district court must conduct a colloquy with a non-English-speaking defendant to ensure that the defendant’s waiver of his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial is made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently. We hold that in these circumstances, a colloquy is required.

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

On April 26, 1991, a federal grand jury indicted Sergio Duarte-Higareda (“Duarte”) and three co-defendants for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and possession of methamphetamine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard AnnigoniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. David CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio DUARTE-HIGAREDA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Alejandro Ferreira-AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Lamon Lee ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose Luis Gonzalez-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. United States v. Jay R. Bishop, United States of America v. Gene R. CardenazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. State v. GoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. United States v. Benjamin J. Diaz-JuarezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API