UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio DUARTE-HIGAREDA, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the issue of whether a district court must conduct a colloquy with a non-English-speaking defendant to ensure that the defendant’s waiver of his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial is made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently. We hold that in these circumstances, a colloquy is required.
FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
On April 26, 1991, a federal grand jury indicted Sergio Duarte-Higareda (“Duarte”) and three co-defendants for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and possession of methamphetamine…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Richard AnnigoniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. David CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio DUARTE-HIGAREDA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Alejandro Ferreira-AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Lamon Lee ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
3Cited by83 opinions
- United States v. Jose Luis Gonzalez-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- United States v. Jay R. Bishop, United States of America v. Gene R. CardenazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- State v. GoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- United States v. Benjamin J. Diaz-JuarezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.