United States v. David Cochran
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Cochran appeals his conviction for extortion under 18 U.S.C. § 1951. He argues that the district court’s failure to conduct an adequate colloquy with him before accepting his written waiver of a jury trial constitutes reversible error. We disagree.
I. FACTS
In open court, before Cochran signed a waiver of jury trial, his lawyer told the court that he and Cochran had “discussed the pros and cons of various methods to proceed.” He said that they had decided that Cochran would waive his right to a jury trial and have a court trial instead. The following exchange then took…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. Eric Charles Martin, A/K/A Mickey Milton ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Stockwell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jose Luis Gonzalez-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Billy Joe Sowell v. Margaret Bradshaw, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. LillyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.