People v. Bavisotto
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, and as modified, affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: On appeal from a judgment of conviction for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and related offenses, defendant’s primary claim is that three eavesdropping warrants were issued without probable cause because the People did not establish "that normal investigative procedures have been tried and have failed, or reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried, or to be too dangerous to employ” (CPL 700.15 [4]; 700.20 [2] [d]). We disagree. Unlike the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. ShedrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. VersaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. CarsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. RomneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. FonvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. CampaigniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. TruverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. BachillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.