State v. Malone
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentGerber, Judge
I respectfully dissent. My concern is about the trial court’s repeated use of the same factor — the gun — to aggravate punishment.
The defendant here committed armed robbery and kidnapping while using a deadly weapon. Because of his weapon he was properly charged with armed robbery rather than robbery. Under A.R.S. § 13-1904, and by definition, armed robbery is an aggravated form of robbery, made so precisely by the presence of such a weapon. For that reason, armed robbery presents a sentence exposure greater than does robbery.
So far so good. The problem arises, however, when this same gun is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BlyArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. Garza RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. OrdunoArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Romley v. HallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- State v. Perez LaraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991