Legal Opinion

State v. Bly

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1980No. 4958-PRPublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

Appellant plead guilty to two counts of armed robbery, a class 2 felony, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1904. Because appellant used a deadly weapon to commit his crimes, the range of sentencing available was prescribed by A.R.S. § 13-604(G). In determining whether to impose the presumptive term rather than the minimum or maximum sentence allowed, the trial judge looked to the aggravating and mitigating factors of A.R.S. § 13-702(C), (D) and (E). The trial judge did not find the evidence of mitigation sufficiently substantial to require that appellant be sentenced to less than the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. PattonArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. MulalleyArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. ChurchArizona Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. CarrigerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. HarmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. State v. DunlopAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API