State v. Bly
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
Appellant plead guilty to two counts of armed robbery, a class 2 felony, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1904. Because appellant used a deadly weapon to commit his crimes, the range of sentencing available was prescribed by A.R.S. § 13-604(G). In determining whether to impose the presumptive term rather than the minimum or maximum sentence allowed, the trial judge looked to the aggravating and mitigating factors of A.R.S. § 13-702(C), (D) and (E). The trial judge did not find the evidence of mitigation sufficiently substantial to require that appellant be sentenced to less than the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. PattonArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. MulalleyArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ChurchArizona Supreme Court · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. CarrigerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HarmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. DunlopAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.