Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Romley v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 8, 1990No. 1 CA-SA 90-189PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

This case arises out of the trial court’s dismissal of an allegation that the charge of aggravated assault was a dangerous offense pursuant to A.R.S. section 13-604(G). The state brought this special action to require the trial court to reinstate the allegation of dangerousness. We accepted jurisdiction, granted relief, and indicated that this opinion would follow. We decide that the state is entitled to allege that the crime is a dangerous offense because the law on this issue has been so long settled in favor of the state, and because the application of State v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. State v. OrdunoArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. McDonald v. CampbellArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. McDonald v. CampbellArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Romley v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API