State v. Garza Rodriguez
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON, Chief Justice.
Defendant, Stella Garza Rodriguez, petitions for review of the court of appeals decision affirming her conviction for armed robbery pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-1904. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24. We granted review to consider whether, under A.R.S. § 13-1904, an armed robbery conviction may be sustained if one committing a robbery threatens to use a weapon but no evidence is offered that a deadly weapon, dangerous instrument, or simulated deadly weapon was present. We conclude that such a conviction may not be sustained.
FACTS…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Phoenix v. Super. Ct., Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Frye v. South Phoenix Volunteer Fire Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. ChristianArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SpencerArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. SantanaArizona Supreme Court · 2004
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.