Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. Troxell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Erom the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Biddle, J.Complaint

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and St. Louis R. W. Co.by appellee, against appellant, •before a justice of the peace, in the following words :

“ Now comes the plaintiff and complains of the defendant, and says, that on the 19th day of May, 1875, by her .employees and agents, was running a locomotive and train of cars upon a certain railroad, which she operated and controlled, in the county of Grant and State of Indiana, struck, passed oyer and killed a heifer, the property of plaintiff, of the value of twelve dollars. Plaintiff avers, that, at the time and place where the said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Indianapolis, Cincinnati, & Lafayette R. R. v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co. v. WeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. BruceyIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co. v. LurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Louisville New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. HannonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Strader v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Ricketts v. SandiferIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API