Sanzo v. Sanzo
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
This appeal arises out of a foreclosure action brought by the plaintiffs, Karen Sanzo and Kathleen Sanzo, owners of a 53.33 percent interest in certain property, against the defendants David Sanzo, Frank Nenninger, Jr., and Patrick Benedetto,1 the owners of a 46.67 percent interest in the property. The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court in which, sua sponte, it modified its prior oral judgment rendered in open court ordering foreclosure by sale of the defendants’ 46.67 percent interest in the property. The court modified this oral judgment in a subsequent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mickey v. MickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Zoning Commission v. Fairfield Resources Management, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Bogaert v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Solomon v. KeiserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. DenyaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McLeod v. A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. HermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. DaytonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- 710 Long Ridge Operating Co. II, LLC v. StebbinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014