Hutzler v. Lord
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. First, Second and Third Exceptions stated in tbe opinion, of the Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. First, Second and Third Exceptions stated in tbe opinion, of the Court. Fourth Exception. — The plaintiff presented the two following prayers: 1. If the jury shall find from the evidence that the plaintiff was owner of thirty shares of the stock of the National Express Company, partly paid up, and that on the thirtieth day of January, 1866, he sold and. delivered the receipts for the same to the defendant, and the defendant failed to have the same transferred to himself on the books of said company, and…
1Opinion of the CourtBryan, J.
The plaintiff below' (now appellee) alleged that he sold the defendant thirty shares of the stock of the National Express and Transportation Company (partly paid up) and that the defendant neglected to have the shares transferred to himself on the books of the company, and that the company, through its assignee having called for an assessment on said shares, the plaintiff was compelled by suit to pay the same. He sought to recover from the defendant the amount so paid.
On the supposition that the plaintiff’s averments were sustained by proper proof, we think that his claim was well founded.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pettigrew v. BarnumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hospelhorn v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Brinkley v. John A. Hambleton & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Man v. BoykinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Annapolis Gas & Electric Light Co. v. FredericksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Pace v. ShawTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.