Legal Opinion

Pace v. Shaw

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1930No. 1322—5424PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, P. J.

This suit was brought by the banking commissioner of Texas against A. V. Pace to recover $500, being a 100 per cent, assessment levied against the owner of five certain shares of stock in the defunct State Guaranty Bank of Goose Creek, Tex. Pace answered by general denial and, in addition, impleaded W. E. Bussey, and sought recovery over against *966■him, as the real owner of the stock. Bussey denied liability to Pace. Tbe trial court rendered judgment in favor of the banking commissioner against Pace for the sum sued for, and adjudged that the latter take nothing on his cross-action against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Kellogg v. StockwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Hutzler v. LordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  4. Fuqua v. ShawTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Pace v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. LevorsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Shaw v. HaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Gossett, Commr. v. SeggermanTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Shaw v. GreenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API