Legal Opinion

Horkey v. Cortz

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided August 23, 1961No. 528, Civil Action, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lynch, Judge:

The complaint seeks damages for personal injuries growing out of an automobile accident which occurred on July 27, 1959, when an automobile owned by the corporate defendant and driven by the individual defendant collided with plaintiff’s motor vehicle.

Plaintiff, in his complaint, set forth two separate and distinct causes of action. The First Cause of Action alleges that Miss Cortz was the agent, servant or employee of Diamond and that she was acting as such when Diamond’s motor vehicle, driven by Miss Cortz, collided with plaintiff’s motor vehicle. The Second Cause of Action…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. Cerchio v. MullinsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
  3. Miller v. Hand Ford Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Lancaster v. Jordan Auto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. Gathright v. Carl Markley Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Clarendon National InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Finkbiner v. MullinsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1987
  3. Silow v. Truxmore Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API