Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Jordan Auto Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 15, 1941No. 9549PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

These two suits, brought to recover damages for personal injuries, caused by an automobile accident, were consolidated and tried together. The jury was waived and judgment was entered in favor of defendant, conformably to findings of facts and conclusions of law made by the District Court. There was undisputed evidence as follows:

Some time in December, 1936, Otto Lan- , caster, a citizen of Louisiana, husband of plaintiff in one suit, made a contract with Jordan Auto Co., a Mississippi corporation, for the purchase of a new Chevrolet automobile, turning in his old car in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. Louisiana Public Utilities Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mudd v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Hall v. Continental Drilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Horkey v. CortzSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Mudd v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Hall v. Continental Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API