Miller v. Hand Ford Sales, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.
The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant to recover damages for personal injuries.
It is conceded by the parties that plaintiff’s cause of action is based upon the theory of the defendant’s breach of warranty arising out of a bailment.
The cause was tried before a jury and the result was a verdict for the defendant. On motion of plaintiff, the trial court set aside the verdict and granted a new trial. From this ruling the defendant appeals.
Defendant’s principal assignment of error is that the trial court should have allowed its motion for a directed verdict. If this contention is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Saunders System Birmingham Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Johnson v. H. M. Bullard Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Eklof v. WaterstonOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Herrett v. HerrettWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Nelson v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Waggoner v. General Motors Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Lovely v. Burroughs CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1974
- Global Tank Trailer Sales v. Textilana-Nease, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Port of Portland v. Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Horkey v. CortzSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.