Legal Opinion

Silow v. Truxmore Industries, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 4, 1978No. Civ. A. 77-80PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEEL, Senior District Judge:

Plaintiff Gary Silow brought this negligence action against defendant Truxmore Industries, Inc. (“Truxmore”) and defendant Louis Willig (“Willig”). Presently before the Court is Truxmore’s motion for summary judgment “on the grounds that reasonable men cannot differ and it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” 1

The standard for granting summary judgment is clear. It should be granted only if,

taking the non-movant’s allegations as true and drawing all inferences in his favor, the court is convinced from its review of the evidential sources available…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scott v. PlanteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Archambault v. HolmesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Beaudoin v. W. F. Mahaney, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
  4. Greenie v. Nashua Buick Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  5. Lott v. GrantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Swart v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API