Legal Opinion

State v. Franklin

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1993No. C-920264PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Judge.

The state of Ohio appeals the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress a handgun seized from the defendant-appellee, William Franklin. The state’s assignment of error challenges the exclusion of the evidence on grounds that the handgun was recovered while Franklin fled during a lawful investigatory stop which did not violate the Fourth Amendment. We have sua sponte removed this appeal from our accelerated calendar. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the trial court correctly suppressed evidence which was a fruit of unreasonable search and an unlawful arrest.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Richardson, Unpublished Decision (1-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. WarrenOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State v. RainesOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. CarmichaelOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API