Legal Opinion
State v. Hill
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 17, 1998No. C-970271PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The state of Ohio appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion to suppress filed by the defendant-appellee, Nathan Hill, in a prosecution for possession of drugs. We reverse that decision and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this decision.
I. Factual Background
Because the sequence of events in this case is important to its proper disposition, we set forth the facts in some detail. On December 6, 1996, Officers Calvin Mathis and Matt Woodard were on special detail, patrolling Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority (“CMHA”) property. The detail included…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CurryOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. DuboseOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. CrossenOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. LyleOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.