State v. Warren
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Painter, Judge.
This case illustrates the distinction between a Terry stop and a Terry frisk. But a frisk is obviously much more intrusive than a stop, and must be justified by a reasonable belief that the person is armed.
On an early evening in June 1997, while still daylight, Officers Rhone and Bruner were on bicycle patrol in the Over-the-Rhine section of Cincinnati. Rhone saw defendant-appellant Quincy D. Warren with another man on a street corner. The two men saw the officers, and one of the men dropped a tissue to the ground. The officers were unsure which man had dropped the tissue. Both…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. DuncanOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. HensonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. Buford, 22149 (5-9-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Haslam, 08-Mo-4 (2-10-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.