State v. Raines
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Marianna Brown Bettman, Judge.
Defendant-appellant George Raines appeals from his conviction and sentence for burglary pursuant to R.C. 2911.12(A)(2). His sole assignment of error, that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction under this provision of the burglary statute, is sustained.
In this case, a police officer on routine bicycle patrol saw Raines leaning into the driver’s-side window of a running parked car in a high-crime neighborhood. He then saw Raines reach down and place something in his shoe. The officer testified that when he was about ten feet from Raines, he told…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Whithead v. KeyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1862
- State v. FranklinOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PaganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. Quintos Q.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- State v. HatchettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.