Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Terry

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 21, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hazleton, S.

A question arises as to whether the value of specifically devised real estate may be considered in determining the amount of counsel fees which should be paid an attorney for his services in connection with an estate. The case of Matter of Wolf (97 N. Y. S. 2d 79 [Richmond Co., 1950]) is cited in support of the proposition that it may not be considered. Since the question seems to put undue emphasis on' one of several items to be considered in fixing an attorney’s fee, it seems well to first review the general rules involved.

The ultimate question in the determination of the amount…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of PottsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. In re the Estate of PottsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924
  3. In re the Estate of SharpNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  4. In re the Estate of KentanaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Sewell & CampbellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of PainterColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. In re the Estate of WalshNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
  3. In re the Estate of SnellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API