Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Sharp
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1931PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
This is a contested accounting by a removed administrator. The representative was duly authorized to manage the real property of the intestate and to collect the rentals therefrom. The account as filed shows that personalty of a value of $1,262.88 came into his hands, and that he collected rentals aggregating $7,525. To this latter sum there must be added $305, representing additional rentals not accounted for, and which the bearing demonstrated he had received. He is, therefore, primarily chargeable in the aggregate sum of $9,092.88.
The claimed credits aggregate $6,795.72,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Collier v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Beard v. . BeardNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of PeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Young v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re NewhoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re the Estate of WoolfsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of HurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re the Estate of TaftNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.