In re the Estate of Walsh
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
John D. Bennett, S.
This is á jirócé8ciing brought By attorneys under Séctitin 231-á bf thé Éürrdgaíé’s Court Act, tb 6x their fde for SérVieéS rendered this éstate, to direct ílié pkjhfterit Of such fed prb fata from certain itéins included in trié tax proceeding as part of the gfoss taxable éStktd, arid fdf payriiéht front them of commissions arid debts df the decedent.
The gross estafe gonsiSts bf rriiSedllanedus items éoiíécte'd aiftouiiting to $401.27, kgainSt which there i§ a funeral bill of $941.38 ánd the counseT fee to tie flidd héféiri. While the pétitióriing attorneys fefdf to k…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Estate of ReichNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- Beakes Dairy Co. v. BernsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- In re the Estate of GellerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Accounting of ElliottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
- In re the Accounting of TerryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Estate of DonleavyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- In re the Estate of HalbauerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- In re the Estate of LewinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- Reff v. KantermanNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- In re the Estate of BleierNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.