Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Snell

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 20, 1962Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lott H. Wells, S.

This is a proceeding under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act to fix and determine the reasonable compensation of the petitioners, as attorneys, the firm of Crapser and Kirsch, Central Building, Massena, New York, and the firm of Vaughan and Lyons, 70 Pine Street, New York 5, New York, for legal services rendered the estate of Bertrand H. Snell. Mr. Crapser was admitted to practice in the State of New York in September, 1937; Mr. Kirsch in October, 1952; Mr. Vaughan in January, 1928; Mr. Lyons in December, 1927.

Bertrand EL Snell, a resident of the Town of Potsdam,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. King v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. In re the Estate of PottsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Cowee v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Austin v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Randall v. . PackardNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API