Legal Opinion

Earls v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1971No. L. A. 29889PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent court to grant her motion to file a petition for dissolution of marriage without the payment of a filing fee. She alleges that on three occasions before filing the instant proceeding, she submitted to respondent court a motion to file her petition for dissolution of marriage in forma pauperis, supported by an affidavit setting forth facts indicating that she was indigent. Twice the motion was denied without any reason ascribed and a third time a secretary to one of the judges of the respondent court stated, without…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Ferguson v. KeaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Robert F. O'Neal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Cunningham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. March v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Jara v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Garcia v. SantanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API