Legal Opinion
March v. Municipal Court
California Supreme Court
Decided July 6, 1972No. S.F. 22864PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
The seven petitioners were all tried together and each was convicted of violation of Penal Code sections 415 (disturbing the peace), 408 (illegal assembly), and 409 (failure to disperse). After the verdicts of conviction, the petitioners filed a timely application with the superior court alleging their indigency and requesting that the transcript of the trial be provided at public expense. This application was denied by the trial court without a hearing on the dual grounds that petitioners were not entitled to a transcript because they had not met their burden under Magezis…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Rinaldi v. YeagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. PinholsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. HawthorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. Steven B.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Andrus v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.