Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Santana

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 2009No. B206513PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZELON, J.

Appellants seek review of the trial court’s determination to award no attorney’s fees against the respondent, who is indigent and became self-represented during this litigation. Acknowledging that they might be unable to collect any amount of such fees awarded, they nonetheless concede that they do not wish tenants who have disputes “to think that they’re free to file or defend litigation without risk of exposure to a fee award.” Using fee awards as an instrument to deny access to the courts is neither the policy of the State of California, nor the purpose of the statute in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  5. DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Donahue v. DonahueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Turner v. Ass'n of American Medical CollegesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Apex LLC v. Korusfood.comCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Adassa Walker v. Ticor Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Roman v. Bre Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API