Legal Opinion

Norman v. Arnold

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2002No. 20010134PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

¶ 1 Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of then-amended complaint- and the denial of their motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. The district court dismissed the amended complaint after granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Arnold and Larson, and after denying plaintiffs leave to file a second amended complaint. With respect to the grant of summary judgment and the dismissal of the amended complaint, we affirm in part and reverse in part. With respect to the denial of leave to file a second amended complaint, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Bekins Bar v. Ranch v. HuthUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Spears v. WarrUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Aurora Credit Services, Inc. v. Liberty West Development, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Oman v. Davis School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Bistline v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Hudgens v. PROSPER, INC.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Savage v. Utah Youth VillageUtah Supreme Court · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API