Cahoon v. HINCKLEY TOWN APPEAL AUTHORITY
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:
T1 Plaintiff Alonzo Cahoon appeals the district court's affirmance of the denial of Cahoon's request for a building permit for his fence by the Hinckley Town Appeal Authority (the Appeal Board). We affirm.
$2 On appeal, Cahoon argues that the correct interpretation of Hinckley Town's ordinance required that the Hinckley Town Planning and Zoning Commission grant Ca-hoon a building permit for the fence he planned to build. 1 Specifically, Cahoon asserts that the fence he ultimately built complies with the ordinance because, either by its plain language or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Miller v. WeaverUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Carrier v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Utah County v. ButlerUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Fox v. Park CityUtah Supreme Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Staker v. Town of SpringdaleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Cahoon v. Hinckley TownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012